Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
Impact in
- Spectroscopy 594
Classified as
- Journal
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001 →Countries where authors are citing Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
This map shows the geographic impact of Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
This network shows the impact of Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions.
About Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions
This paper, published in 1990, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Richard R. Ernst, Geoffrey Bodenhausen and Alexander Wokaun covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (594 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (330 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (307 citations), Materials Chemistry (230 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (217 citations). Published in Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001.