Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex
Impact in
- Cell Biology 450
Classified as
- Journal
- The Journal of Cell Biology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200509124 →Countries where authors are citing Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex
This map shows the geographic impact of Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex
This network shows the impact of Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex.
About Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: Role of the LINC complex
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Melissa Crisp, Qian Liu, Kyle J. Roux, Jerome B. Rattner, Catherine M. Shanahan, Brian E. Burke and Didier M. Hodzic covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (950 citations), Cell Biology (450 citations), Physiology (54 citations), Genetics (43 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (42 citations). Published in The Journal of Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200509124.