Conduction in non-crystalline materials
Impact in
- Materials Chemistry 1.9k
Classified as
- Authors
- N. F. Mott
- Journal
- Philosophical magazine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1080/14786436908216338 →Countries where authors are citing Conduction in non-crystalline materials
This map shows the geographic impact of Conduction in non-crystalline materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conduction in non-crystalline materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conduction in non-crystalline materials more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conduction in non-crystalline materials
This network shows the impact of Conduction in non-crystalline materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conduction in non-crystalline materials.
About Conduction in non-crystalline materials
This paper, published in 1969, received 3.0k indexed citations . Written by N. F. Mott covering the research area of Geophysics, Ceramics and Composites and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (726 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (624 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (600 citations). Published in Philosophical magazine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1080/14786436908216338.