Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- LORETTA J. ROSS
- Journal
- Souls
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634 →Countries where authors are citing Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism
This map shows the geographic impact of Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism
This network shows the impact of Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism.
About Reproductive Justice as Intersectional Feminist Activism
This paper, published in 2017, received 280 indexed citations . Written by LORETTA J. ROSS covering the research area of Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (88 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations), Gender Studies (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (71 citations) and General Health Professions (38 citations). Published in Souls.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634.