Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
Impact in
- Communication 1.4k
Classified as
- Authors
- Arvind MalhotraAlbert H. Segars
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669 →Countries where authors are citing Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
This map shows the geographic impact of Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
This network shows the impact of Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective.
About Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective
This paper, published in 2001, received 4.6k indexed citations . Written by Arvind Malhotra and Albert H. Segars covering the research area of Strategy and Management and Communication. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (2.1k citations), Communication (1.4k citations), Sociology and Political Science (783 citations), Information Systems and Management (779 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (692 citations). Published in Journal of Management Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669.