A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680 →Countries where authors are citing A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear
This map shows the geographic impact of A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear
This network shows the impact of A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear.
About A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating “unseen” fear
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by J. S. Morris, Annelie Bränström Öhman and Raymond J. Dolan covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (852 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations), Social Psychology (195 citations), Clinical Psychology (80 citations) and Sensory Systems (79 citations). Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680.