Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought
This map shows the geographic impact of Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought
This network shows the impact of Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought.
About Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by David D. Breshears, Neil S. Cobb, Paul M. Rich, Kevin P. Price, Craig D. Allen, Randy G. Balice, William H. Romme, Jude H. Kastens, M. Lisa Floyd and Jayne Belnap covering the research area of Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (733 citations), Atmospheric Science (642 citations), Ecology (561 citations) and Plant Science (244 citations). Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505734102.