Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles

565 indexed citations
published 2001

Countries where authors are citing Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles.

About Polarization consistent basis sets: Principles

This paper, published in 2001, received 565 indexed citations . Written by Frank Jensen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (365 citations), Spectroscopy (175 citations), Materials Chemistry (165 citations), Organic Chemistry (128 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (99 citations). Published in The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1063/1.1413524.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact