Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes
Impact in
- Surgery 2.4k
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes
This map shows the geographic impact of Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes
This network shows the impact of Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes.
About Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes
This paper, published in 2015, received 3.4k indexed citations . Written by Michael A. Blazing, Robert Patrick Giugliano, Jennifer A. White, Pierre Théroux, Harald Darius, Basil S. Lewis, Ton Oude Ophuis, J. Wouter Jukema, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari and Witold Rużyłło covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (2.4k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (798 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (689 citations), Economics and Econometrics (627 citations) and Cancer Research (317 citations). Published in New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1410489.