An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models
Impact in
- Instrumentation 349
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models
This map shows the geographic impact of An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models more than expected).
Fields of papers citing An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models
This network shows the impact of An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models.
About An updated MILES stellar library and stellar population models
This paper, published in 2011, received 614 indexed citations . Written by Jesus Falcon-Barroso, Patricia Sanchez-Blazquez, Alexandre Vazdekis, E. Ricciardelli, Nicolás Cardiel, Andres Javier Cenarro, J. Gorgas and Reynier Peletier covering the research area of Astronomy and Astrophysics and Instrumentation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (585 citations), Instrumentation (349 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (31 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (30 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (23 citations). Published in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116842.