Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Chemical Society Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00308c →Countries where authors are citing Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics
This map shows the geographic impact of Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics
This network shows the impact of Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics.
About Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics
This paper, published in 2016, received 609 indexed citations . Written by Ping‐Ping Shi, Yuan‐Yuan Tang, Peng‐Fei Li, Wei‐Qiang Liao, Zhong‐Xia Wang, Qiong Ye and Ren‐Gen Xiong covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (483 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (388 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (228 citations), Biomedical Engineering (113 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (71 citations). Published in Chemical Society Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00308c.