Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies
Impact in
- Neurology 113
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Reviews Nephrology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0284-7 →Countries where authors are citing Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies
This map shows the geographic impact of Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies
This network shows the impact of Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies.
About Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies
This paper, published in 2020, received 391 indexed citations . Written by Claudio Ronco and Thiago de Azevedo Reis covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering, Infectious Diseases and Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Infectious Diseases (267 citations), Neurology (113 citations), Surgery (75 citations), Nephrology (68 citations) and Oncology (50 citations). Published in Nature Reviews Nephrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0284-7.