The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature Climate Change
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1 →Countries where authors are citing The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
This map shows the geographic impact of The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
This network shows the impact of The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation.
About The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation
This paper, published in 2018, received 360 indexed citations . Written by Éric F. Lambin, Holly K. Gibbs, Robert Heilmayr, Kimberly M. Carlson, Leonardo C. Fleck, Rachael Garrett, Yann le Polain de Waroux, Constance L. McDermott, David McLaughlin and Peter Newton covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Global and Planetary Change and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Global and Planetary Change (202 citations), Strategy and Management (130 citations), Ecology (82 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (73 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (57 citations). Published in Nature Climate Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0061-1.