Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid
This map shows the geographic impact of Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid
This network shows the impact of Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid.
About Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid
This paper, published in 2023, received 273 indexed citations . Written by Ian A. P. Thompson, Gerald B. Kasting, Ronen Polsky, David D. Cunningham, Hyongsok Tom Soh and Jason C. Heikenfeld covering the research area of Pharmaceutical Science, Immunology and Allergy and Dermatology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pharmaceutical Science (121 citations), Biomedical Engineering (116 citations), Molecular Biology (51 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (49 citations) and Dermatology (29 citations). Published in Nature Biomedical Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00998-9.