Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets
Impact in
- Materials Chemistry 2.0k
Classified as
- Authors
- Lapo BoganiWolfgang Wernsdorfer
- Journal
- Nature Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nmat2133 →Countries where authors are citing Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets
This map shows the geographic impact of Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets
This network shows the impact of Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets.
About Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets
This paper, published in 2008, received 2.8k indexed citations . Written by Lapo Bogani and Wolfgang Wernsdorfer covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.3k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.0k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (683 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (669 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (474 citations). Published in Nature Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nmat2133.