A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/nature02905 →Countries where authors are citing A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator
This map shows the geographic impact of A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator
This network shows the impact of A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator.
About A tunable carbon nanotube electromechanical oscillator
This paper, published in 2004, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by V. A. Sazonova, Yuval Yaish, Hande Ustunel, David J. Roundy, T. A. Arias and Paul L. McEuen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (837 citations), Materials Chemistry (682 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (462 citations), Biomedical Engineering (258 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (26 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/nature02905.