Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core
Impact in
- Atmospheric Science 1.2k
- Ecology 351
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/359311a0 →Countries where authors are citing Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core
This map shows the geographic impact of Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core
This network shows the impact of Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core.
About Irregular glacial interstadials recorded in a new Greenland ice core
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by S. J. Johnsen, Henrik Clausen, W. Dansgaard, Katrin Führer, Niels S. Gundestrup, Claus Uffe Hammer, Jean-Noël Jouzel, B. Stauffer and Jørgen Peder Steffensen covering the research area of Atmospheric Science and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atmospheric Science (1.2k citations), Ecology (351 citations), Anthropology (324 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (267 citations) and Paleontology (232 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/359311a0.