Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres
Impact in
- Materials Chemistry 1.4k
Classified as
- Authors
- P. N. PuseyW. van Megen
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/320340a0 →Countries where authors are citing Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres
This map shows the geographic impact of Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres
This network shows the impact of Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres.
About Phase behaviour of concentrated suspensions of nearly hard colloidal spheres
This paper, published in 1986, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by P. N. Pusey and W. van Megen covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.4k citations), Biomedical Engineering (559 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (355 citations), Organic Chemistry (320 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (236 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/320340a0.