Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis
Impact in
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cell Biology 534
Classified as
- Journal
- Nature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1038/279679a0 →Countries where authors are citing Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis
This map shows the geographic impact of Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis
This network shows the impact of Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis.
About Coated pits, coated vesicles, and receptor-mediated endocytosis
This paper, published in 1979, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Joseph L. Goldstein, Richard G.W. Anderson and Michael Scott Brown covering the research area of Biomaterials and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (1.1k citations), Cell Biology (534 citations), Immunology (268 citations), Surgery (244 citations) and Physiology (214 citations). Published in Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1038/279679a0.