LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/tra0000837 →Countries where authors are citing LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.
This map shows the geographic impact of LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.
This network shows the impact of LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic..
About LGBTQ populations: Psychologically vulnerable communities in the COVID-19 pandemic.
This paper, published in 2020, received 269 indexed citations . Written by John P. Salerno, Natasha D. Williams and Karina A. Gattamorta covering the research area of Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (144 citations), Clinical Psychology (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (53 citations), General Health Professions (44 citations) and Gender Studies (36 citations). Published in Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/tra0000837.