A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Motivation Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091 →Countries where authors are citing A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.
This map shows the geographic impact of A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.
This network shows the impact of A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article..
About A 50-year review of psychological reactance theory: Do not read this article.
This paper, published in 2017, received 234 indexed citations . Written by Benjamin D. Rosenberg and Jason T. Siegel covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (108 citations), Social Psychology (56 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Marketing (30 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (29 citations). Published in Motivation Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/mot0000091.