Construct validity in psychological tests.

7.6k indexed citations
published 1955

Impact in

Classified as

Authors
Lee J. CronbachPaul E. Meehl
Journal
Psychological Bulletin

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1037/h0040957 →

Countries where authors are citing Construct validity in psychological tests.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Construct validity in psychological tests.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Construct validity in psychological tests. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Construct validity in psychological tests. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Construct validity in psychological tests.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Construct validity in psychological tests.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Construct validity in psychological tests..

About Construct validity in psychological tests.

This paper, published in 1955, received 7.6k indexed citations . Written by Lee J. Cronbach and Paul E. Meehl covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (1.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations) and Education (947 citations). Published in Psychological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/h0040957.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modesBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper A modified particle swarm optimizerBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cellsBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Animal Species and EvolutionBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?Breakdown of academic impact, for the paper Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testingBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper An Introduction to Boundary Layer MeteorologyBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern SociologyBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper MULTIVARIABLE PROGNOSTIC MODELS: ISSUES IN DEVELOPING MODELS, EVALUATING ASSUMPTIONS AND ADEQUACY, AND MEASURING AND REDUCING ERRORSBreakdown of academic impact, for the paper Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy