Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
This map shows the geographic impact of Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
This network shows the impact of Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development and validation of the State Hope Scale..
About Development and validation of the State Hope Scale.
This paper, published in 1996, received 2.8k indexed citations . Written by Charles R. R. Snyder, Susie C. Sympson, Tyrone F. Borders, Michael A. Babyak and Raymond L. Higgins covering the research area of Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (889 citations), Applied Psychology (817 citations), Clinical Psychology (788 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (360 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (309 citations). Published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.321.