Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Ed Diener
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.653 →Countries where authors are citing Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.
This map shows the geographic impact of Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.
This network shows the impact of Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem..
About Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.
This paper, published in 1995, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Ed Diener and Ed Diener covering the research area of Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (993 citations), Sociology and Political Science (405 citations), Clinical Psychology (320 citations), Applied Psychology (289 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (287 citations). Published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.4.653.