Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Robert J. Sternberg
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607 →Countries where authors are citing Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.
This map shows the geographic impact of Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.
This network shows the impact of Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom..
About Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.
This paper, published in 1985, received 785 indexed citations . Written by Robert J. Sternberg covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (458 citations), Social Psychology (303 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (133 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (125 citations) and Education (90 citations). Published in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607.