Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.
Impact in
- Health 647
- Journal
- American Psychologist
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.1.15 →Countries where authors are citing Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.
This map shows the geographic impact of Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.
This network shows the impact of Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient..
About Socioeconomic status and health: The challenge of the gradient.
This paper, published in 1994, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by Nancy E. Adler, Thomas G. Boyce, Margaret A. Chesney, Sheldon Cohen, Susan Folkman, Robert L. Kahn and S. Leonard Syme. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health (647 citations), General Health Professions (603 citations), Sociology and Political Science (361 citations), Social Psychology (330 citations) and Clinical Psychology (284 citations). Published in American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.1.15.