Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00244 →Countries where authors are citing Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules
This map shows the geographic impact of Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules
This network shows the impact of Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules.
About Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules
This paper, published in 2018, received 380 indexed citations . Written by Hans Lischka, Dana Nachtigallová, Adélia J. A. Aquino, Péter G. Szalay, Felix Plasser, Francisco B. C. Machado and Mario Barbatti covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (238 citations), Materials Chemistry (102 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (100 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (65 citations) and Spectroscopy (44 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00244.