Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588 →Countries where authors are citing Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals
This map shows the geographic impact of Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals
This network shows the impact of Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals.
About Bright Side of Lignin Depolymerization: Toward New Platform Chemicals
This paper, published in 2018, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by Zhuohua Sun, Bálint Fridrich, Alessandra De Santi, Saravanakumar Elangovan and Katalin Barta covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (1.6k citations), Mechanical Engineering (438 citations), Biotechnology (380 citations), Plant Science (378 citations) and Organic Chemistry (256 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00588.