Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy

961 indexed citations
published 2004

Countries where authors are citing Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy.

About Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy

This paper, published in 2004, received 961 indexed citations . Written by Bartholomew H. Sparrow. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Communication (524 citations), Sociology and Political Science (509 citations), Political Science and International Relations (281 citations), Philosophy (94 citations) and Strategy and Management (79 citations). Published in Perspectives on Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1017/s1537592704350589.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact