Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
Impact in
- Ecology 4.1k
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
This network shows the impact of Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.
About Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges
This paper, published in 2005, received 6.7k indexed citations . Written by David Dudgeon, Angela H. Arthington, Mark O. Gessner, Zen’ichiro Kawabata, Duncan J. Knowler, Christian Lévêque, Robert J. Naiman, Anne‐Hélène Prieur‐Richard, Doris Guzman Soto and Melanie L. J. Stiassny covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (4.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.9k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Aquatic Science (1.0k citations) and Water Science and Technology (911 citations). Published in Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006950.