A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Psychological Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1017/s0033291708003814 →Countries where authors are citing A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder
This map shows the geographic impact of A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder
This network shows the impact of A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder.
About A systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychosis continuum: evidence for a psychosis proneness–persistence–impairment model of psychotic disorder
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.8k indexed citations . Written by Jim van Os, Richard J. Linscott, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Philippe Delespaul and Lydia Krabbendam covering the research area of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (429 citations), Philosophy (346 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (273 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (226 citations). Published in Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1017/s0033291708003814.