Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin

532 indexed citations
published 2002

Countries where authors are citing Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin.

About Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin

This paper, published in 2002, received 532 indexed citations . Written by Adriana Bigi, G. Cojazzi, Silvia Panzavolta, Norberto Roveri and Katia Rubini covering the research area of Archeology and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (328 citations), Biomedical Engineering (204 citations), Molecular Medicine (90 citations), Food Science (60 citations) and Surgery (57 citations). Published in Biomaterials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00235-1.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact