Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL
Impact in
- Cell Biology 428
Classified as
- Journal
- Cell
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00278-2 →Countries where authors are citing Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL
This map shows the geographic impact of Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL
This network shows the impact of Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL.
About Actin Dynamics Control SRF Activity by Regulation of Its Coactivator MAL
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Francesc Miralles, Guido Posern, Alexia-Ileana Zaromytidou and Richard Treisman covering the research area of Immunology and Allergy, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (745 citations), Cell Biology (428 citations), Immunology and Allergy (136 citations), Oncology (105 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (103 citations). Published in Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00278-2.