Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Norman L. Allinger
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3160(08)60212-9 →Countries where authors are citing Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods
This map shows the geographic impact of Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods
This network shows the impact of Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods.
About Calculation of Molecular Structure and Energy by Force-Field Methods
This paper, published in 1976, received 423 indexed citations . Written by Norman L. Allinger covering the research area of Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (193 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (132 citations), Spectroscopy (130 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (122 citations) and Materials Chemistry (81 citations). Published in Advances in physical organic chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0065-3160(08)60212-9.