THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE
Impact in
- Genetics 104
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)29238-2 →Countries where authors are citing THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE
This map shows the geographic impact of THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE more than expected).
Fields of papers citing THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE
This network shows the impact of THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE.
About THE ROLE OF INTESTINAL BACTERIA IN THE METABOLISM OF SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE
This paper, published in 1972, received 389 indexed citations . Written by Mark A. Peppercorn and Peter J. Goldman covering the research area of Pharmacology, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (143 citations), Genetics (104 citations), Epidemiology (63 citations), Oncology (60 citations) and Pharmacology (60 citations). Published in Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3565(25)29238-2.