The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- David HummelsJun IshiiKei‐Mu Yi
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(00)00093-3 →Countries where authors are citing The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade
This map shows the geographic impact of The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade
This network shows the impact of The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade.
About The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade
This paper, published in 2001, received 2.0k indexed citations . Written by David Hummels, Jun Ishii and Kei‐Mu Yi covering the research area of Strategy and Management and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.7k citations), Strategy and Management (1.1k citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.1k citations), Finance (187 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (154 citations). Published in Journal of International Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1996(00)00093-3.