Ensemble forecasting of species distributions
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling 2.1k
- Ecology 1.4k
Classified as
- Journal
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010 →Countries where authors are citing Ensemble forecasting of species distributions
This map shows the geographic impact of Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ensemble forecasting of species distributions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ensemble forecasting of species distributions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ensemble forecasting of species distributions
This network shows the impact of Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ensemble forecasting of species distributions.
About Ensemble forecasting of species distributions
This paper, published in 2006, received 2.9k indexed citations . Written by Miguel Bastos Araújo and Mark George New covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecological Modeling (2.1k citations), Ecology (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (605 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (578 citations). Published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.010.