Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?
Impact in
- Radiation 205
Classified as
- Journal
- Radiotherapy and Oncology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.008 →Countries where authors are citing Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?
This network shows the impact of Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?.
About Clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy: Why and how?
This paper, published in 2019, received 360 indexed citations . Written by Jean Bourhis, Pierre Montay‐Gruel, Patrik Gonçalves Jorge, Claude Bailat, Benoît Petit, Jonathan Ollivier, Wendy Jeanneret‐Sozzi, Mahmut Özşahin, François Bochud and Raphaël Moeckli covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (262 citations), Radiation (205 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (84 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (31 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (16 citations). Published in Radiotherapy and Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.008.