Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Wentao LiuDi WuJieci Wang
- Journal
- Physics Letters B
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139052 →Countries where authors are citing Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity
This map shows the geographic impact of Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity
This network shows the impact of Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity.
About Light rings and shadows of static black holes in effective quantum gravity
This paper, published in 2024, received 74 indexed citations . Written by Wentao Liu, Di Wu and Jieci Wang covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (48 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (47 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (19 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (8 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (1 citation). Published in Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139052.