Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Physiotherapy
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004 →Countries where authors are citing Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis
This network shows the impact of Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis.
About Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis
This paper, published in 2011, received 667 indexed citations . Written by Richard W. Bohannon and A. Williams Andrews covering the research area of Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (204 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (83 citations), Biomedical Engineering (76 citations), Physiology (69 citations) and Transportation (66 citations). Published in Physiotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.004.