Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia
Impact in
- Epidemiology 199
Classified as
- Journal
- Ophthalmology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013 →Countries where authors are citing Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia
This map shows the geographic impact of Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia
This network shows the impact of Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia.
About Global Prevalence of Presbyopia and Vision Impairment from Uncorrected Presbyopia
This paper, published in 2018, received 361 indexed citations . Written by Tim Fricke, Nina Tahhan, Serge Resnikoff, Eric Papas, Anthea Burnett, Suit May Ho, Thomas Naduvilath and Kovin Naidoo covering the research area of Epidemiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Epidemiology (199 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (98 citations), Ophthalmology (80 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (38 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (33 citations). Published in Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.013.