Design approaches to experimental mediation
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012 →Countries where authors are citing Design approaches to experimental mediation
This map shows the geographic impact of Design approaches to experimental mediation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design approaches to experimental mediation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design approaches to experimental mediation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Design approaches to experimental mediation
This network shows the impact of Design approaches to experimental mediation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design approaches to experimental mediation.
About Design approaches to experimental mediation
This paper, published in 2016, received 403 indexed citations . Written by Angela G. Pirlott and David P. MacKinnon covering the research area of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (188 citations), Social Psychology (136 citations), Clinical Psychology (59 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (54 citations) and Applied Psychology (52 citations). Published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.012.