Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

474 indexed citations
published 2020

Countries where authors are citing Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review.

About Arsenic removal technologies and future trends: A mini review

This paper, published in 2020, received 474 indexed citations . Written by Shafinaz Shahir, Norahim Ibrahim, Jibrin Ndejiko Mohammed, Dai‐Viet N. Vo and Fazilah Abd Manan covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Chemistry (364 citations), Water Science and Technology (173 citations), Biomedical Engineering (147 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (97 citations) and Pollution (77 citations). Published in Journal of Cleaner Production.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123805.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact