Antisense technology: A review
Impact in
- Genetics 28
Classified as
- Journal
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100416 →Countries where authors are citing Antisense technology: A review
This map shows the geographic impact of Antisense technology: A review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antisense technology: A review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antisense technology: A review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antisense technology: A review
This network shows the impact of Antisense technology: A review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antisense technology: A review.
About Antisense technology: A review
This paper, published in 2021, received 239 indexed citations . Written by Stanley T. Crooke, Xue‐hai Liang, Brenda F. Baker and Rosanne M. Crooke covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (188 citations), Genetics (28 citations), Cancer Research (26 citations), Genetics (21 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (13 citations). Published in Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100416.