Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
Impact in
- Immunology 308
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
This map shows the geographic impact of Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
This network shows the impact of Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.
About Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
This paper, published in 2012, received 872 indexed citations . Written by Stefan Mark Nidorf, John W. Eikelboom, Charley Ann Budgeon and Peter Lindsay Thompson covering the research area of Molecular Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (435 citations), Immunology (308 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (199 citations), Surgery (194 citations) and Epidemiology (164 citations). Published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.027.