A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021 →Countries where authors are citing A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking
This map shows the geographic impact of A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking
This network shows the impact of A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking.
About A phase field formulation for hydrogen assisted cracking
This paper, published in 2018, received 407 indexed citations . Written by Emilio Martínez Pañeda and Christian F. Niordson covering the research area of Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (272 citations), Materials Chemistry (171 citations), Mechanical Engineering (112 citations), Metals and Alloys (105 citations) and Computational Mechanics (56 citations). Published in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.021.