Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I)
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- John F. GunionHoward E. Haber
- Journal
- Nuclear Physics B
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90340-8 →Countries where authors are citing Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I)
This map shows the geographic impact of Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I) more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I)
This network shows the impact of Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I).
About Higgs bosons in supersymmetric models (I)
This paper, published in 1986, received 850 indexed citations . Written by John F. Gunion and Howard E. Haber covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (844 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (254 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (11 citations), Artificial Intelligence (10 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (8 citations). Published in Nuclear Physics B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(86)90340-8.