Empirical research methods in operations management
Impact in
Classified as
Countries where authors are citing Empirical research methods in operations management
This map shows the geographic impact of Empirical research methods in operations management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Empirical research methods in operations management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Empirical research methods in operations management more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Empirical research methods in operations management
This network shows the impact of Empirical research methods in operations management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Empirical research methods in operations management.
About Empirical research methods in operations management
This paper, published in 1990, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Barbara Bechler Flynn, Sadao Sakakibara, Roger G. Schroeder, Kimberly A. Bates and Edward J. Flynn covering the research area of Management Information Systems and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Information Systems (712 citations), Strategy and Management (690 citations), Marketing (199 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (192 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (181 citations). Published in Journal of Operations Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-x.