Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- George F. Koob
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(92)90060-j →Countries where authors are citing Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways
This map shows the geographic impact of Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways
This network shows the impact of Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways.
About Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways
This paper, published in 1992, received 1.9k indexed citations . Written by George F. Koob covering the research area of Toxicology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Molecular Biology (799 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (284 citations), Physiology (194 citations) and Pharmacology (150 citations). Published in Trends in Pharmacological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0165-6147(92)90060-j.