Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Kathryn A. LeeGerman Nino‐Murcia
- Journal
- Psychiatry Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90027-m →Countries where authors are citing Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue
This map shows the geographic impact of Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue
This network shows the impact of Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue.
About Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue
This paper, published in 1991, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Kathryn A. Lee and German Nino‐Murcia covering the research area of Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (184 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (141 citations), Oncology (129 citations) and Social Psychology (84 citations). Published in Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90027-m.